Stories

The case for expanding Alberta’s charter schools

Garnett Genuis
September 23, 2013
Unambiguous Success Held Back in Spite of the Evidence
Stories

The case for expanding Alberta’s charter schools

Garnett Genuis
September 23, 2013
Unambiguous Success Held Back in Spite of the Evidence
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

This past month, as over 600,000 Albertan school children returned to school, around 8,500 mostly Calgarian students were enrolled in charter schools. The latter number has increased little over the past several years, at a time when more and more countries around the world are seeing the benefits of such schools.

The basic concept is that the schools are publicly funded but operate independent of local school boards. They are able to take on a character defined in their charter that caters to children desiring a certain educational style.

Albertan charter schools specialise in music, serving gifted children, science, First Nations education, and single sex education, among other missions. Aside from their special character, these schools have additional flexibility in their staffing, how they use their funding, management, and curriculum.

The evidence that these schools are successful is becoming conclusive.  After reporting mixed results for U.S. Charter schools in 2009, Stanford University’s Center for Research on Educational Outcomes (CREDO) issued an update of their extensive studies, finding that “charter schools now advance the learning gains of their students more than traditional public schools in reading. [In math] learning gains are now similar to those of students in traditional public schools.”

Eric Hanushek, also from Stanford, recently published a study taking in test results of over one million students from 42 countries and found that in developed countries schools with better autonomy achieve better results for their students.

Here in Alberta, a study of scores in grades three, six, and nine published last month by the C.D. Howe Institute found a strong Charter School advantage, “The gap between charter schools and all other schools is large and consistent across all three grades …even with controls for observed student background, [it] would seem to merit further investigation.”

But other countries are already taking such cues and offering the charter choice to more children.  In the U.S., 41 States now have charter school legislation and the number of students attending the schools has risen 80 per cent to 2.3 million over four years.

British Education Secretary Michael Gove is pulling no punches as he converts more than half of the country’s schools to charter style Academies. When criticised by members of the education ‘establishment’ he responds, “there are still a tiny minority of teachers who see themselves as part of The Blob and have enlisted as Enemies Of Promise.”

In Sweden research shows that children do better and teachers are happier at Free Schools, which were first allowed in 1992 and nearly one-in-six students now attend. Even tiny New Zealand is getting in on the act. The first Partnership Schools, as their version is called, will open this February.

Alberta’s approach to educational choice is starting to look like Japan’s economy did in the 1990s. Once formidable and still amongst the leaders, but worryingly stagnant. The number of charter schools remains miniscule in the context of the wider education system, as does the number of children attending them.

Why does Alberta, generally known for its ethos of school choice, lag this global trend in spite of international and local evidence that more charter schools would improve children’s performance?

It can’t be that there is no demand; existing schools have very long waiting lists, reportedly 7,000 long in one case. The problem is one of supply, and specifically the process for opening the schools and attaining buildings to house them.

In order to start a charter school, the would-be operators must approach the local school board with their business plan, and ask the school board to achieve the same objectives. The school board can choose to take the ideas for itself, or reject them out of hand. As one commentator has put it, it would be like GM giving Ford its blueprints and only being given permission to build the new design if Ford didn’t want to appropriate them.

Then there is the supply of buildings, which is again at the behest of the local school board. Not only does GM have to submit its plans to Ford, but ask it for factory space. For these reasons, new and expanding charter schools are rarer than hot Februaries in Saskatchewan. These constraints have kept Charter Schools as bit players in spite of mounting local and international evidence, but more importantly parental preferences. It is high time the provincial government eased restrictions on Charter Schools and put parents back in the drivers’ seat.

~

Garnett Genuis is the Executive Director of Parents for Choice in Education. He is a long-time political activist who has been a Parliament Hill and Prime Minister’s Office Staffer, the coordinator of a political training program through the Canadian Centre for Policy Studies, an editor at an internet news company, and a candidate for provincial public office. Before joining PCE, he was the Executive Director of Responsible Electricity Transmission for Albertans. In his day job, Garnett is the Vice-President of Abingdon Research.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

Fists of Ham: Why the Liberals Keep Trying (and Failing) to Control the Internet

Folk wisdom holds that bad things come in threes. Now we have conclusive proof. The federal Liberals’ trio of ham-fisted bills aimed at bringing the internet to heel – the Online Streaming Act, Online News Act and Online Harms Act – are obvious and spectacular failures that are doing or will do great damage to Canadians. Peter Menzies takes a close look at the flaws of this calamitous trio, paying special attention to the threat posed to free expression in Canada by the recently unveiled Online Harms Act. For an administration that prides itself on its modernity, how has the Justin Trudeau government gone so wrong nearly three decades into the digital era?

Why India Could Become the Next Global Superpower: Part II

With America in decline at home and its influence waning abroad, the question of which nation might be the next global superpower has gained urgency. While the world arguably needs a dominant power to protect global order and prevent regional conflicts from spiralling, this can’t just be any country with sufficient arms and ambition. America’s replacement should be a moral superpower, one that safeguards freedom and enables prosperity for every nation, as the U.S. has done for the last 80 years. In the first installment of this two-part series, Lynne Cohen proposed that India could fulfill that role. She put forth 10 characteristics that together make a moral superpower, and dug into the first five, examining India’s economic and demographic strengths. In this second part, Cohen focusses on politics and power, assessing India’s performance on the final five criteria, starting with perhaps the most important – military might.

Why India Could Become the Next Global Superpower: Part I

It’s more than just dispiriting to behold the Canadian military’s disintegration and the current government’s deliberate neglect of our national defence. It raises the question of who might protect Canada in the future, given we can’t protect ourselves. For decades, the answer was simple: the United States. But with America in turmoil and decline, we can’t take that for granted anymore. Who could step up to become the next global hegemon? Lynne Cohen puts forth a provocative and bold answer: it might just be India. Cohen offers 10 criteria by which to measure the potential for a rising power to be not just expansionist, acquisitive or exploitative, but to become a moral superpower, one dedicated to safeguarding freedom and building prosperity for all. In Part One of this special two-part series, Cohen examines and rates how India has progressed in the first five criteria.

More from this author

A hopeful dispatch from the West Bank

This spring Canadian MP Garnett Genuis joined a Parliamentary tour of the West Bank hosted by the Palestinian Authority. As the only Conservative and unabashed Zionist on the bus, he sought to challenge both his own assumptions and the narrative presented by his hosts. Genuis saw a friendly, welcoming, and gracious people whose rich culture has been subverted by politics. And despite the latest bloody confrontations in Gaza, he also saw reason to hope for peace and a viable two-state solution, which is a fresh and encouraging perspective on a tragic conflict that will never be resolved as long as the narrative is dominated by victimization, blame, and failure to understand the experience of the other.

Share This Story

Donate

Subscribe to the C2C Weekly
It's Free!

* indicates required
Interests
By providing your email you consent to receive news and updates from C2C Journal. You may unsubscribe at any time.